About Me

My photo
Don’t Change……….. I was a neurotic for years. Anxious, depressed, selfish. And everyone kept telling me to change. And I resented them, and agreed with them, and wanted to change, but simply couldn’t, no matter how I tried. What hurt the most was that, like the others, my close friend kept urging me to change. So I felt powerless and trapped. One day a friend said “Don’t change. I accept you as you are.” Those words were music to my ears: “Don’t change. Don’t change. Don’t change…………… I accept you as you are.” I relaxed. I came alive. And, suddenly, I changed! -“The songs of the bird” by Anthony de Mello

Popular Posts

Pages

Thursday, April 22

POLITICS AND POLITICAL SYMBOLS IN NATESAN MUTHUSWAMY PLAYS

“Modern Theatre activity in India as anywhere else in the world. Can be understood only by probing carefully into the work of a number of outstanding individuals, Directors, Performers, Designers, Playwrights”. Our modern work is significant as a creative endeavor deeply concerned with the human condition. It is the words of Nemichandra Jain. Thus, the outstanding and perfectly suitable for Natesan Muthuswamy’s Modern Theatre works. He has the modern quality of Artistic endeavor.

Natesan Muthuswamy was a multi – faceted personality in Indian Theatre. He was a Poet. Short Story Writer, Playwright, Director, Voice Trainer, Actor Trainer who dominating in the theatre scene for the sixty years. He has written two collections of plays. 30 numbers of Short stories and a collection of essays on Theru-k-koothu.
Born in Purisai, a village in Tamil Nadu, Muthuswamy moved to Madras in the late 1950s to work as a clerk. It was here that the often corrupting forces of urban life compelled him to reflect on the relatively innocent and genuine nature of village life and customs. Later he began to write Short stories on this theme. In the lates 1960s, he abandoned prose to write for the stage, relying heavily on allegery. The plays that began to take shape were driven not by a linear narrative, but by a unique conversational logic that revealed the playwright’s pen chant for creating poetic and highly dramatic “Pictures” on stage.

Natesan Muthuswamy’s Theatre:

Natesan Muthuswamy is a founder and recipient Playwright for Kootu-P-Pattarai. Natesan Muthuswamy is recognized as a leading pioneer in experimental Tamil Theatre. In 1969, his production entitled time after time was hailed as the first modern play in Tamil Stage history. Since then, dozens of more plays have followed.

He went eight years of intense study of Theru-k-koothu, the traditional folk street theatre of Tamil Nadu, which left an indelible mark on Muthuswamy’s concepts of Theatre, Playwriting and Theatrical training. These concepts led to the development of his new theatre group Koothu-P-Pattarai. His achievement was to simultaneously revive traditional folk theatre and create a new idiom for the contemporary stage based on movement and sound as the main vehicles of story telling.

His plays depicted the destruction of personal identity by popular consumer culture through a method that infused folk theatre conventions, with a fresh and contemporary significance. The folk theatrical devices of the narrator. The musk, aerobic and puppetry thus took on multiple meanings as intrinsic parts of theme and dramatic structure. The influence of his native village Purisai theatre was throughout many of his plays, revealing his steed fast resistance to the city’s narrow terms of acceptance and the intellectual impoverishment of modern India and many of her historical choices.

Natesan Muthuswamy established the Koothu-P-Pattarai is the only fulltime professionalized folk theatre of Tamil Nadu. Koothu-P-Pattarai has built a new idiom for the contemporary stage known as “total” or “body” theatre. Other sources of inspiration include sculpted temple panels and visual folk arts under the direction of N. Muthuswamy, body theatre incorporates elements of dance, folk theatre, puppetry and martial arts so that space, movement and choreography become more important to the action than literary content or dialogue. With actors mastering Kalari, a martial arts form resembling dance, as well as other styles of movement, this extremely physical kind of stage presentation in essentially theatre told through movement and music. “Consciousness is not confined to the brain. The face, legs, arms and the entire body each have a consciousness of their own so that expression can come through one or all of them “cast members accordingly undergo vigorous training in the expressive possibilities of body, voice and sound.

Natesan Muthuswamy has presented his plays in major cities of India and also outside the country. He was honoured with the Sangeet Natak Academi Award in 1999 – 2000. He has written and directed many plays. His major plays are “Time AfterTime”, “Naarkalikkaran”, “Suvaroottigal”, “England”, “Natruniappan”, “Thenaliraman” , “Chandravati” and “Paduklam” (2002), “Prahalada Charithram” (2003) and “Appavum Pillayum”.

Abandoning the language plot, as individual human predicaments are not his main concern. Muthuswamy paints broad images of social and political transformation. Seeing the world as more than just a simple catalogue of discrete historical events, this Playwright focuses not on the loss of Punjai and its ancient village level, innocence but on the urgent need for its recovery and affirmation.

Some of the striking features of Na. Muthuswamy’s Dramas are intently political in its import of significance. Na. Muthuswamy is a leftist from his childhood. He influenced by Marxist Philosophy. But he never uses his ideology in his plays. He cannot write the politics very openly. He always uses the politics as a background of the play. We cannot get the meaning directly. He always uses some of his plays general words for the characters. He invariably picks up for dramatization actions. That are the public and societal rather than purely personal and psychological Muthuswamy’s plays derives its strength. Mainly from its socio – political relevance. In this paper I have taken five of his plays are relevant to politics. They are:

1. Narkalikaran

2. Suvarottigal

3. England

4. Natrunaiappan

5. Thenaliraman

We can further categorize the play according to their distinct trends in the literary plays written during the past twenty years and group the plays accordingly for the sake of analysis. Narkalikaran and Suvarottigal and England belong to the Drama as an analysis of cultural politics. The plays like Natrunaiappan and Thenaliraman is an adaptation of folk themes and elements of folk theatre in modern socio – political scene. Here I have to awake Madhan voze words.

Theatre has hardly cared to look beyond the façade of the problems and consequently overlooked the politics implied in them. A situation turns into a problem and the problem becomes more and more complex and complicate due to politics played by the vested interests. In a way no one could claim to be free of politics. If the theatre is to be more and more meaningful, it would have to read the politics implied in any given situation.

Natesan Muthuswamy says his views about the politics. “I never had seen the political plays of Kerala and West Bengal. I don’t have any political identity. But that political play never stands continuously. This type of political plays makes tired to us. Now the political plays give sudden communication and great satisfaction. But those things never continuous in the modern time. As a truthful Artist never need a political ideology and problem matice identity in theatre continuous work is important and Artist should need the sincerity in work. If he succeeds Artist can get the higher achievement. If in a very good social context different Art forms and various visions are the healthy co – exist. He is a truthful artist. He never was stocked in politics. He never belongs to any political party of Tamil Nadu. He is a common man. He never claims anything from the political party. He doesn’t have any political ideology.

Finally I want to end up the words of Art Director, painter, Artist P. Krishnamoorthy. “Nobody has ever written Tamil Dramas like Muthuswamy. He uses new techniques in his plays and because of his rural roots; a relished nativity can be seen in his writing. One cannot find this powerful rawness anywhere else. He has a talent for building on and elaborating small incidents and can create drama out of Marbles being played of the sticking of wall posters. With full scope for song and movement he is full-fledged writer who is totally involved with the troupe he has started. Acclaim and recognition should have come earlier. His movement has only now slowly picked up. This is because of other commercial forces. One cannot write the history of Tamil Theatre and literature without dealing with Muthuswamy’s contribution.

Tuesday, March 16

PAARI PADUKALAM


  PAARI PADUKALAM:SCRIPT & DIRECTION BY PRALAYAN
 THE LIGHTING DESIGN BY Dr.C.RAVEENDRAN & S.VELAYOUDAME

      The Bharat Rang Mahotsav (BRM) was started a decade ago by the National School of Drama in order to contribute to the growth and development of theatre across the country. From being an annual national festival that presented the most creative of recent work in India, it has grown into an international event, hosting theatre companies from around the world. It is today acknowledged as one of the largest theatre festivals of Asia – dedicated only to theatre – and is firmly established on the global theatre festival map. Over time it has evolved into an opportunity for audiences and students alike to enjoy and critically engage with the process and practice of the theatre arts as reflective of the issues and concerns of our troubled times. The play has been selected as one of the Tamil entry almost there are another fourteen play competed.
     This play participated in the Bharat Ranga Mahotsav Theatre Festival-2010 and the performance of “Paari Padukalam” Directed by Mr.Pralayan was held on 12th January 2010 at Abhimanch Theatre, National School of Drama, New Delhi. Mr.Pralayan, Director and Freelancer has been assigned to direct “Paari Padukalam” as a production of a Department of Performing Arts, Pondicherry University under the financial support to meet the cost of production from the NSD (Regional Resource Centre, Bangalore) and the Department of Performing Arts.

       Paari Padukalam is a historical play which tries to question a particular narrative of a grand Tamil past centered on the legend of empire building of the Cholas, Cheras and Pandyas. It seeks to espouse the alternative ethos of a tribal society led by another legendary king who goes by the name of Paari. Known in popular lore and in classical Tamil literature for his extreme qualities of charity, Paari is also portrayed as the independent leader of a tribal society that lived in the hills of Parampu, much to the annoyance of the empires. The source for this annoyance is not merely related to the acclaimed virtues of Paari as a 'giver' who never says no to anybody no matter what they ask or because of the way of life of the tribal society that lived in tandem with nature and not out of it. But the independence of that society went along with their low social status, living outside the margins of the high society, in the eyes of the ruling emperors. That such a lowly king could be the subject of so much praise by the poets irritates the stratified mainstream kingdom of the Chola king, who manages to bring together his own rivals, the Cheras and Pandyas in a war to destroy the tribal society and its King, Paari.

       The play alternatively depicts the ethos of a non-stratified community of a hill tribe, their way of life, their love and respect for nature, a livelihood based on labour and a dignity arising out of a sense of equality in contrast to the court based rule of the Chola emperor and his ways of patronage and politics underpinned by a society that was already stratified as high and low. When the itinerant singers and balladeers extol the virtues of Tamil as a grand unifying political force, the politics of high and low as practiced by the empire would rather choose identities of the social on unequal terms than language. Language fails to stop the war. Language fails to bridge two worldviews, one espousing a dream of a world based on equality and the other based on inequality and identities. Murdered on the battlefield, the dying tribal king raises pertinent issues on the politics of the empire, identity and language.


















Wednesday, February 3

AESTHETICS AND STYLE IN STAGE MAKE-UP

Aesthetics means the study of beauty of an object and ‘its’ education or science. In the West many theories have been formed from the days of Aristotle. One of the aesthetic theories is to find beauty in Real Life, Literature, Poetry, Painting, Sculpture and Drama, etc.

Men everywhere recognize beauty in some form, but our experience and understanding are enriched and broadened as we proceed with the study of aesthetics and the factors that underlie the aesthetic experience. Since aesthetic experience pertains to the perceptual level of human experience, one has to make clear the distinction among a sensation, a percept and a concept. As a result of a stimulus we receive a sensation. Through one of our organs we may see, hear, touch, smell or taste something. When these sensory impulses are organized into units or wholes, we recognize objects such as stones, trees, books or people.

Aesthetic experience that is the result of perceptual experience is most frequently visual / auditory. But it is not limited to those areas. It may be related to our sense of touch, taste, or smell. Aesthetic experience includes any pleasurable absorption in these perceptual experiences insofar as it arises from a disinterested contemplation of phenomena, whether natural or man-made.

The aesthetic “emotion” may be aroused by artistic productions, in which the artist has attempted to evolve an aesthetic response. The human head gives three characteristics of the aesthetic mood or aesthetic attitude. They are:
1. The aspect of detachment, in which a person during the experience is released from the practical concerns of every day living.

2. The true aesthetic attitude is disinterested and non-possessive. To appreciate without the itch to acquire, to love without longing to possess, to contemplate with joy and satisfaction but without thought of social advantage, economic gain, or practical exploitation. This is to achieve the disinterested attitude that is fundamental to the aesthetic mood.

3. The aesthetic attitude is impersonal and thus involves the temporary elimination of certain expressions of the personality. One is absorbed by the certain expression of personality.

The aesthetic object absorbs one; in a sense one gets outside himself / herself transcends his / her narrow interests and acquires a new perspective.

STAGE MAKE UP AND AESTHETICS

Stage make-up means, decorating and wearing ornaments for a particular scene, for a particular stage. A character is drowning differently on a stage by his make up of the way in which he is wearing costume, makeup, and ornaments. The important thing in a make up is to show the special characteristics of a character to the audience. The audience should be able to recognize the importance of the character just by visualizing the make up worn by the characters on stage. There are many works involved doing make up for an actor

STYLE

In general, style is a particular way to do something, more specifically, an art; style comprises those distinctive characteristics that enable the observer to link an art work with other works which can be grouped for study. There are two kinds of styles.Those characteristics linking works within a time, period, culture, or school. That is more or less a time - place - artist’s classification of individual creative artist’s work. It has the general aspects of form, subject matter and content.

STYLE OF ART:

The style of art reflects the period of the Art form; one can learn the political, economic, social values of the period through art forms. This kind of art reflects the time and space given to the individual artist and it depends on / is mingled with his / her life. The art style is made out of an artist’s habit and culture, it leads to the artistic expression of the artwork and also this persists as separate. Art forms are always a part of human life where people have continuously been expressing their choice and interests. Now days this interest is seen in costume, make up and ornaments.

In theatre a possible basis for any consideration of theatrical style is the extent and nature of its departure from realism. The mechanisms of performance, particularly the need for an actor to project a character rather than simply feel it, make true realism almost impossible to achieve on a stage.

Since acting style have these roots in realism it is the visual elements that must make the boldest statements in a production. The costumes worn by the actors need to be based, to some considerable extent, on real clothes. The departure of the scenic environment from the reality of nature can be almost total. But since actors are at the heart of any theatrical performance, we need to consider some basic aspects of acting style before the visual contribution.

Theatre styles are visualized in scenes for the audience. The director or a team of creative people use theatre styles which transforms many aspects and elements to reach the spectators. They are

1. Visual Style

2. Acting Style

3. Costume Style

4. Scenic Style

5. Lighting Style

6. Make up Style

Elements of theatre consist of acting, visuals, costume, makeup, lighting and set design and these elements put together is dramatic style or production style. In theatre selecting a particular style depends upon the designers of the production team. It started in realism, and the above elements are depended upon each other and form a new production style. Stage make up is one of the important elements in production style.

MAKE UP AND STYLE

Make up is a vital element in creating the total appearance of the actor. To a great extent the make up design gives the audience its primary clue to the age, health and vitality of the character. Although the overall appearance of the actor is the costume designer’s domain, a make up designer; under the artistic supervision of the costume designer, is often responsible for the design and execution of the make up.

Stage make up enhances the illusion that the actor has become the character. In almost every production some of the actors for one reason or other do not facially resemble the characters they are playing. Make up can help in solving this challenge by providing actors with the means to change their appearance through the skillful application of various techniques of make up. Young faces can be made to look older, older faces younger, pretty faces less attractive, blemished skin clear and rather plain faces ravishingly attractive. A great deal of the communication process that transfers information from the actor to the audience takes place visually.

To fully understand what the actors are saying (actually what they are meaning) the audience must be able to read their facial expressions. In medium-size and large theatres many members of the audience are seated quite a distance from the stage. Therefore, a primary function of make up is to enhance or exaggerate the actor’s features.

Make up designs usually begin with a sketch. Using a photograph of an actor a sketch can be made following the general shape and features of the person’s face. Although this personalized make up sketch provides you with a clearer vision of how the finished make up design will appear, make up designs can also be sketched on generic, or non specific face drawings.

Stage makeup means decorative makeup and wearing ornaments for a particular scene for a particular stage. A character is shown differently on a stage by his make up or the way in which he is wearing ornaments. The important thing in a makeup is to show the special characteristics of a character to the audience. The audience should be able to recognize the importance of the character by just viewing the make up worn by the characters on stage. There are many things involved in doing make up for an actor.

Make up style means decorating the actor according to the character for a particular play. Make up style can depend on either the character in a play or the production style of the entire production team. Therefore make up style means decorating all the characters in a play according to a particular production style. Makeup style should be created according to the script, playwright’s interpretations, artistic director and the production team. Another main thing in make up is the dramatic style. Therefore these are the important constituents for make up in a successful performance.

There are four general stylistic categories of stage make-up - straight, remedial, character and fantasy. As with style in other areas of theatrical design, the demarcation in practice between the various categories is unimportant. The labels are just convenient road signs for relative locations on the continuum of style.

STYLIZED MAKEUP

The world has a rich cultural legacy literally thousands of years old. It has many traditional performances. Every performance has its own make up. The traditional make-ups are stylized. The stylized make-up plays a key role in Theru-k-koothu, or Kathakali, or Noh or Bunraku. In modern times, a term called stylization is used. Stylization is not only used in acting but is also used in set design, costume, and lighting design and also in make up. In a production the dramatic style and the stylization are entirely different things.

For example, if a production team or a director wishes to do a play from a Shakespearean drama in a Theru-k-koothu form, then he can give the performance with all the characteristics of Theru-k-koothu - like the songs, dances from it. He can take the make up style of a particular play like “Macbeth” and give a performance

The makeup style depends on various things like attaching a beard, a mustache, side burns etc. Hairstyles also play an important role developing a character in a play, for example when a young man is transformed into an old man, gray hair is used.
In total, make-up plays an important role in theatrical productions in terms of creating a sense of aesthetic feelings in the mind of the audience.